Adding Value through Accredited Testing to ISO/IEC Guide 25
With barriers to international trade decreasing and more products
being designed for the global marketplace, it is increasingly
important for manufacturers of electrical and electronic devices to
demonstrate compliance with the appropriate EMC standards. To
simplify global trade, national accreditation bodies in more than 20
countries now have mutual recognition agreements (MRAs) that
facilitate mutual recognition of test reports. Most countries accept
testing at a laboratory accredited to ISO/IEC Guide 251
by organizations such as NVLAP, A2LA, UKAS, or the National
Association of Testing Authorities (NATA) as proof of compliance.
Manufacturers can also use a test report bearing the endorsement of
a recognized accreditation agency as the basis of a due diligence
defense in a dispute with a regulatory agency.
The most direct route to EMC compliance is generally by ensuring
that a product meets appropriate EMC standards and then by making a
Declaration of Conformity (DoC). In most cases, a technical
construction file that contains the proof of compliance (usually
including a test report) must be available to the relevant
authorities. This article will explain the advantages of using
accredited testing and give guidance for selecting the most
appropriate test house. The terms accredited testing and MRA
laboratories will be used to refer to laboratories that have ISO/IEC
Guide 25 accreditation from an organization such as NATA, NVLAP,
A2LA, UKAS, or similar organizations that have MRAs in place.
NATA MRA Partner Laboratories
In Australia, NATA has an MRA with the Testing Multilateral
Agreement Group of the European Cooperation for Accreditation of
Laboratories (EAL). MRAs are also in place with NIST/NVLAP and A2LA.
NATA's network of MRAs covers 34 laboratory accreditation bodies in
23 economies. This includes the countries and national accreditation
bodies shown in Table I. Reports endorsed by any of the
international bodies listed are considered equivalent to NATA
reports.
Austria
|
BMwA |
Belgium |
BELTEST, BKO-OBE |
Denmark |
DANAK |
Finland |
FINAS |
France |
COFRAC |
Germany |
DACH, DAP, DATech, DEKITZ,
DKD |
Hong
Kong, China |
HOKLAS |
Ireland |
NAB |
Italy |
SINAL, SIT |
Japan |
JAB, JNLA |
Korea |
KOLAS |
Netherlands |
RvA |
New Zealand |
IANZ (formerly TELARC)
|
Norway |
NA |
Portugal
|
IPQ |
Singapore |
SAC-SINGLAS |
South
Africa |
SANAS |
Spain |
ENAC |
Sweden |
SWEDAC |
Switzerland |
SAS |
Taiwan |
CNLA |
United
Kingdom |
UKAS, NAMAS |
United
States |
NVLAP, A2LA |
Table I. The National Association of Testing
Authorities has MRAs with the laboratory accreditation bodies
of these 23 economies. |
Enforcement of EMC Regulations
In the event that a product's compliance is called into question,
most regulators will conduct an audit of the relevant compliance
file and, if not satisfied, may request further evidence to support
the claims of compliance. The test report is the key element of the
compliance documentation, and it provides the evidence for any
claims of compliance. In the United States, a NVLAP or A2LA
accredited test report to FCC rules is accepted by the FCC as proof
of compliance with FCC Part 15 Rules for Personal Computers. In
Australia, the Australian Communication Authority (ACA) will accept
a NATA or MRA partner accredited test report as final in any
determination. In Europe, reports bearing the endorsement of a
nationally recognized accreditation agency such as DKD or UKAS are
accepted by regulators as proof of compliance. Severe financial
penalties may apply to individuals and companies that willfully
violate EMC regulations. Regulators can insist upon product recall
and ban products from the market. German and UK regulations have
provisions for prison sentences.
ISO/IEC Guide 25 Requirements for Accreditation of Test
Laboratories
ISO/IEC Guide 25 accredited test houses must be thoroughly
evaluated by the accreditation agency. Accredited test houses must
meet internationally recognized standards for good laboratory
practice and calibration traceability of measurement equipment, have
the necessary test facilities available, demonstrate an adequate
level of technical competence, and operate with the appropriate
quality management systems in place. ISO 9002 alone is not
acceptable for accreditation of test laboratories because it does
not include the key criteria of technical competence and adequate
technical facilities prescribed by Guide 25 requirements. ISO/IEC
Guide 25 usually requires accreditation of laboratories against each
specific EMC standard, and a test report may not be endorsed unless
the test house is accredited to the specific standard.
For example, a test house accredited by NVLAP to FCC Part 15 may
not endorse a test report to CISPR 11. The NVLAP endorsement may
only be applied to tests performed that are covered by the specific
scope of the accreditation. ISO/IEC Guide 25 also requires that
laboratories perform ongoing proficiency tests and interlaboratory
comparison tests in their field of accreditation. Accredited
laboratories are subject to rigorous technical and quality systems
audit and periodic reassessment.
Advantages of Using ISO/IEC Guide 25 Accredited Testing
In Australia, testing by an ISO Guide 25 NATA-accredited
laboratory is a safe way to prove compliance. An endorsed report is
acceptable by the ACA and most of Australia's trading partners,
including all European Union countries. Accredited testing will
minimize risks should a dispute arise with a regulatory agency.
Nonaccredited testing has its drawbacks because laboratories are not
subjected to the rigorous surveillance that accreditation requires
and there is often no guarantee of the reliability or accuracy of
the results. The use of nonaccredited testing is generally less
expensive, but in practice it may be rejected by the regulator.
Consequently, the level of risk carried by the person who signs the
DoC based on unaccredited testing is greater.
Factors to Consider When Selecting an EMC Test House
Test Time and Test Costs. The cost of testing is directly related
to the duration of the test and the use of the test facilities. The
number of applicable tests and the nature of the product will affect
the total test time. Devices that are slow to respond or difficult
to exercise require longer test times and are therefore subject to
higher test charges. Charges also depend on the nature of the test,
the technical competence of the test house, the sophistication of
the facilities, and the organization's accreditation status.
Appropriate Standards Accreditations. A test house may use NATA
or an equivalent MRA partner endorsement when it is accredited for
testing to just one standard. Some accredited test houses have a
limited scope of accreditation, often being accredited to one
standard only. In addition, some consultants (nontest houses) are
accredited as Competent Bodies and Conformity Assessment Bodies. The
accreditation logo often appears in advertising literature giving
the perception that the Competent Body or Conformity Assessment Body
consultancy is accredited for testing. The use of the accreditation
logo by a test house with limited accreditation may mislead people
to think the test house has a wider scope of accreditation than it
actually has.
When selecting a test house, the supplier must be satisfied that
the laboratory is accredited to the appropriate standard and to all
the applicable clauses of that standard. An accredited test report
may only carry the endorsement of the accreditation agency if it is
issued by a laboratory that is accredited to the specific EMC
standard, including all the relevant clauses.
Questions to Ask the Test House
Are you an accredited test house? Some non–test house
consultants are accredited Competent Bodies or Conformity Assessment
Bodies and their role is to review documentation; they must not
perform testing in support of a technical construction file (TCF)
assessment unless they are specifically accredited by the
appropriate agency for that testing. It is important that in any TCF
assessment, the Competent Body prevents the occurrence of a conflict
of interest. In Australia, testing by consultant Competent Bodies
and Conformity Assessment Bodies is against NATA rules and the EMC
framework.
What is the actual scope of the accreditation? Find out if
you will receive an unconditional endorsed test report. It is
important to ask whether the test house has specific accreditation
for the appropriate test standards that your product must satisfy to
earn compliance. For example, a test house accredited only for EMI
testing to CISPR 22 cannot issue an endorsed report if testing to
CISPR 14 or to any other standard not covered by the terms of the
accreditation. A copy of the actual scope should be requested if in
doubt.
Does the scope of accreditation cover the complete
standard? An accreditation for a particular standard may limit
the frequency range or exclude some of the clauses in that standard.
A test house's limited accreditation may mean that it may not be
possible for that test house to establish your product's compliance
with the complete standard. For example, a test house accredited to
CISPR 22 may be restricted to frequencies up to 1000 MHz. If your
product requires FCC testing for harmonics up to 4 GHz, then the
test report may not be endorsed for frequencies above 1000 MHz.
Is the testing subcontracted to another test house? It is
important to know whether the test house has an in-house test
capability or if the test will be subcontracted to another test
house. Some consultants including Competent Bodies and Conformity
Assessment Bodies advertise testing and certification services but
actually subcontract the testing to local or overseas test houses.
Such double handling is likely to inflate test costs, delay report
generation, and inevitably frustrate the flow of correspondence if a
failure occurs and fixes are required. ISO/IEC Guide 25 requires
that the test house notify the client in advance of any
subcontractor testing and that the subcontractor must have the
appropriate accreditation. Unaccredited subcontractors should not be
accepted.
Will an endorsed test report be provided? Companies also
should inquire whether there is a surcharge for an endorsed report
and how many copies of the final report they are entitled to
receive.
What is the level of test house expertise? You may want to
ask about the experience of the staff who actually perform the
tests. The experience and proficiency of the test house personnel
will directly affect the test duration and accuracy. You may want to
inquire about the test house's use of automated compliance test
equipment and its test procedures, which can affect efficiency in
testing time and costs.
Does the quoted price include a desk/design review prior to
the testing program? The probability of test failure is very
high for first-time testing. A brief desk/design review by an
experienced EMC test house can quickly identify potential trouble
spots and help to minimize potential test failures, and thereby
reduce test time and testing costs.
What happens if the product fails the EMC tests? You will
want to know the test house policy for when a product fails the
compliance test. Ask whether testing proceeds to conclusion followed
by the issue of a noncompliance report. Also, determine if the test
house automatically performs simple diagnostic tests once a
noncompliance has been recorded. A brief fault investigation at this
stage can save one pass through the test house.
Does the test house supply spectrum plots of EMI
measurements? Spectrum plots of different test configurations
can help diagnose and rectify an EMI failure. You will want to ask
about the additional costs for a retest if a product fails the
initial test. Inquire whether the original fee applies again.
What is the test house policy on witnessing the testing of the
product? If the test house does permit you to view the testing,
you will want to know if there is a surcharge. Witnessing testing
provides companies with valuable insight into the EMC issues
relating to your product, and this can benefit future product
design.
Does the test house provide a consultation service to assist
in achieving compliance? If consultation is offered, ask about
the levels of experience and qualifications of the consultant. Your
company can benefit from the test-house practical experience gained
from thousands of tests and fixes.
Most countries have regulations that mandate compliance with EMC
standards before products can be legally marketed. When selecting an
experienced EMC test house, companies can be well served to work
with one that is also a Competent Body and Conformity Assessment
Body. By asking the right questions, you can locate a test house
that is accredited to test to all of the relevant EMC standards and
that can assist with the complexities of regulatory approvals,
standards, and specifications.
Employing MRA-accredited testing is the lowest risk approach to
EMC compliance and can help facilitate global regulatory acceptance
of your product. MRA-accredited reports are accepted by Competent
Bodies and Conformity Assessment Bodies and may be used to support a
TCF. ISO/IEC Guide 25 accredited test reports can serve as your
product's passport through trade barriers into overseas markets.
1. International Organization for Standardization, ISO/IEC Guide
25: "General Requirements for the Competence of Calibration and
Testing Laboratories," 3rd ed., Geneva, 1990.
Chris Zombolas is technical director for EMC Technologies Pty
Ltd. in Australia. He can be reached at chris@emctech.com.au.